14 Comments
User's avatar
Ivo Bakota's avatar

Please see the discussion (if any) of my observations on Martin’s post (link below):

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/finding-the-flu-is-easy-just-google/comment/16596514

Expand full comment
Martin Neil's avatar

Hi Ivo. There us a lot of pneumonia in the data in 2020 but low flu positivity. Pneumonia never went but flu did?

Expand full comment
Ivo Bakota's avatar

Pneumonia is almost flat, with no winter peak. It actually declines a bit in our winter. Australia closed its borders on 20 March 2020.

Does that mean flu and other viruses that suddenly dropped off are all imported and pneumonia is a local phenomenon?

Why do these imported viruses then go up again without the borders re-opening borders?

NSW lockdown was July-Oct 2021 for reference.

All very strange, I can’t see any pattern that makes any sense.

Expand full comment
Martin Neil's avatar

It peaked in Spring 2020 and summer 2021. Not flat.

Also they are ED pneumonia presentations. If people staying at home cos of lockdowns they won't be turning up at ED unless it's severe.

Expand full comment
Ivo Bakota's avatar

Hi Martin. Thanks for your reply and your original article/s, your article got me thinking about this anomaly again. I looked at it a while back and gave up digging and had pretty much lost interest in it.

Sorry, I wasn't very clear about the ED pneumonia presentations, I should have written that it’s almost flat in 2020 from about mid April 2020 (our Autumn).

You make a very good point regarding lockdowns and ED presentations during lockdown in 2021 . You could say ED presentations track around the historical average in 2021 until they start to decline again due to the NSW lockdowns starting about July 2021.

Every category of influenza and other respiratory viruses were tracking at or above the 4 year historical average in summer 2020 (some way above) then amazingly they just drop off to way below the 2016-2019 average. Apparently, they test all samples for influenza and they only test a subset of samples for the other viruses, the strange “flat bits” and “sudden jumps” could just be an artifact of how many tests were performed.

I only just noticed the note below the graphs labelled Section 14 (in the above thread), "There were only 26 cases of influenza reported in 2021". That's 26 cases in a population of 8.166 Million people, for comparison there were about 113,521 influenza A cases in reported 2019. NSW only had about 28,000 reported COVID-19 cases in 2021.

I've since found a report summarizing the 2021 season. They only managed to test 27 samples to determine the type/subtype (A, B, C, H1N1, H3N2 ), in a country of 24 Million people. Absolutely amazing (if true)! I've added a link to the report in the thread above.

I also managed to find the number of test for influenza and they actually INCREASED. Supporting what Fabain said regarding testing not declining in Germany, same seems to be true in NSW. I've added it to the thread above (screen shot of Section 9) + some other graphs that you might find interesting.

Does this suggest:

Influenza can be “locked out” of the country by quarantine/border closures (like an invasive foreign species).

Other respiratory viruses (are like a local species) seem lay dormant waiting for a while and explode in the absence of influenza (or increased testing). So, influenza normally out competes them or maybe they just aren’t of much interest in a normal “flu year”?

Influenza makes a comeback in the winter flu season after borders re-open. Does this mean that influenza needs to be “reseeded” annually? Or, maybe, NPI are more effective at reducing influenza than other respiratory viruses?

Despite an increase in all the other 7 respiratory viruses, excess deaths from repository viruses remained at near record lows.

This makes less sense and raises more questions the more I think about at it.

Maybe, epidemiological and viral disease models are not as predictive as epidemiologists and virologists would like us to believe.

Maybe I just don't get it and have missed something fundamental.

Expand full comment
Martin Neil's avatar

Lots to mull over still. It's a complex multifactorial system with lots of moving parts. Academic epidemiology doesn't seem to have the tools for this and people favour simple explanations and are overconfident.

Expand full comment
Ivo Bakota's avatar

Thanks again for the reply.

Speaking of complex multifactorial systems with lots moving parts. Are you guys working on a model like you describe in:

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/weltanshauung?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

Or is just too time consuming to complete such a project without research funding?

Expand full comment
Martin Neil's avatar

No, not that one and in any case we can't get funding. Why would the state fund research that contradicts or incriminates the state?

Expand full comment
Fabian Spieker's avatar

Martin, I totally hear you there.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

The 'flu was re-branded in 2020. Big pharma like doing that to boost sales. Most big companies do that whatever the product, 'New!, Improved!' but just the same old probable slightly smaller and more expensive.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/what-is-the-flu-aka-covid-19-and

Expand full comment